Norton
Norton v. Midland Credit Management, Inc.
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 GAYLE NORTON, No. 1:22-cv-00266-JLT-SKO
12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF
COURT TO CLOSE THE CASE
14 MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC., (Doc. 14) 15 16 Defendants. 17
18 19 On December 6, 2022, the parties filed a joint stipulation dismissing the action with 20 prejudice. (Doc. 14.) In light of the parties’ stipulation, this action has been terminated, see Fed. 21 R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has 22 been dismissed with prejudice. Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. 23
24 IT IS SO ORDERED.
25 Dated: December 7, 2022 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto . 26 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 27
28