Trate

(HC) Diaz-Lozano v. Trate

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 5, 20221:22-cv-01403California1,199 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FAUSTO DIAZ-LOZANO, No. 1:22-cv-01403-JLT-SKO (HC) Petitioner, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

(Doc. No. 4)

v. ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR WRIT

OF HABEAS CORPUS, DIRECTING CLERK

OF COURT TO ENTER JUDGMENT AND

CLOSE CASE

B. M. TRATE, Warden, et al., [NO CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY IS Respondents. REQUIRED] 18 19 Petitioner Fausto Diaz-Lozano is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On November 2, 2022, the assigned magistrate judge issued Findings and Recommendations to dismiss the petition for lack of jurisdiction. (Doc. No. 4.) Those Findings and Recommendations were served upon all parties and contained notice that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.