Trate

(HC) Diaz-Lozano v. Trate

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 5, 20221:22-cv-01403California1,199 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 FAUSTO DIAZ-LOZANO, No. 1:22-cv-01403-JLT-SKO (HC) 12 Petitioner, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

13 (Doc. No. 4)

14 v. ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR WRIT

OF HABEAS CORPUS, DIRECTING CLERK

15 OF COURT TO ENTER JUDGMENT AND

CLOSE CASE

16 B. M. TRATE, Warden, et al., [NO CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY IS 17 Respondents. REQUIRED] 18 19 20 Petitioner Fausto Diaz-Lozano is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 21 pauperis with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. This matter was 22 referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 23 302. 24 On November 2, 2022, the assigned magistrate judge issued Findings and 25 Recommendations to dismiss the petition for lack of jurisdiction. (Doc. No. 4.) Those Findings 26 and Recommendations were served upon all parties and contained notice that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.