Clayborne
(PS) DeVan Daniel v. Clayborne
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MELVIN DEVAN DANIEL, No. 2:22–cv–1350–KJM–KJN PS 12 Plaintiff, ORDER 13 v. (ECF Nos. 9, 10.) 14 ROBERT CLAYBORNE, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff filed a complaint on July 29, 2022, asserting various civil rights claims against 18 various officers and city officials in the City of Stockton. 1 (ECF No. 1.) Plaintiff also requested 19 leave to proceed in forma pauperis, which the court granted. (ECF Nos. 2, 3.) The court screened 20 the complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915, found it failed to state a claim, but found leave to amend 21 warranted. (ECF No. 3.) Since that time, plaintiff has requested multiple extensions of time to 22 amend his complaint, asserting significant personal health issues. (ECF Nos. 4, 7, 9.) Most 23 recently, plaintiff asserts these issues are continuing and may take some time to resolve. (ECF 24 No. 9.) 25 In the interests of justice and the court’s management of its docket to conserve judicial 26 resources,…