Johnson v. California Forensic Medical Group, Inc.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1
2
3
4
5
6
7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10 RANDALL SCOTT JOHNSON, DECEASED, No. 2:19-cv-01722 JAM by and through his Successor in 11 Interest, KATHERINE JOHNSON, KATHERINE JOHNSON, individually, 12 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S Plaintiff, MOTION TO REOPEN DISCOVERY 13 AND SCHEDULE TRIAL DATE AND v. RELATED DEADLINES/HEARINGS 14 SHASTA COUNTY, a public entity; 15 CALIFORNIA FORENSIC MEDICAL GROUP, INC., a California 16 Corporation, et al., 17 Defendants. 18 Plaintiff comes now before the Court seeking to reopen 19 discovery.1 See Mot. to Modify Scheduling Order (“Mot.”), ECF 20 No. 137. Defendants oppose the motion. Opp’n, ECF No. 150. 21 Plaintiff replied. Reply, ECF No. 151. For the reasons set 22 forth below, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s motion to reopen 23 discovery.2 24 1 Plaintiff’s motion to modify scheduling order and to compel 25 financial condition discovery, filed after the close of discovery, shall be construed by the Court as a motion to…