Gilbert v. Sacramento/Dunnigan Holding. Co Inc

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 8, 20222:22-cv-01639California646 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DARREN GILBERT, No. 2:22-cv-1639 DB 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 SACRAMENTO/DUNNIGAN HOLDING CO INC dba WATT AVE CHEVRON, 15 HARWANT KAUR KANG, 16 Defendants. 17 18 Each of the parties in the above-captioned case has consented to proceed before a United 19 States Magistrate Judge. See U.S.C. § 636(c). Accordingly, this matter has been reassigned to 20 the undersigned for all purposes. (ECF No. 11.) This matter is set for a Status (Pretrial 21 Scheduling) Conference on December 23, 2022. (ECF No. 12.) 22 Review of plaintiff’s complaint finds that it alleges a federal claim for violation of the 23 Americans with Disabilities Act, as well as California state law claims for violation of the Unruh 24 Civil Rights Act and California Health and Safety Code. (Compl. (ECF No. 1) at 2.) The Court 25 has supplemental jurisdiction over the state law claims. A district court may decline to exercise 26 supplemental jurisdiction over a state law claim “in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.