Coleman

Coleman v. Shasta County

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 8, 20222:17-cv-00655California8,719 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JAMES COLEMAN, et al., No. 2:17-cv-00655-TLN-DMC 12 Plaintiffs, 13 v. ORDER 14 COUNTY OF SHASTA, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 This matter is before the Court on Defendants County of Shasta (“County”), Deputy Tim 18 Estes (“Estes”), and Deputy Gary Nunnelly’s (“Nunnelley”) (collectively, “Defendants”) Motion 19 for Summary Judgment. (ECF No. 35.) Plaintiffs James Coleman (“Coleman”) and MC Health 20 & Wellness Center, Inc. (“MC Health”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) filed an opposition. (ECF No. 21 37.) Defendants filed a reply. (ECF No. 39.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court 22 GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Defendants’ motion. 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND1 2 Coleman resides on property in Shasta County, California. (ECF No. 37-1 at 3.) The 3 property is in a remote wooded area and consists of two adjoining lots, which are each 20 acres. 4 (Id.) The southern lot fronts the road, while the northern…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.