Jimenez

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MARIO RENE ARREGUIN, Case No. 1:22-cv-01575-CDB (PC)

12 Plaintiff,

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION

13 v. SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR

FAILURE TO EXHAUST ADMINISTRATIVE

14 A. JIMENEZ, et al., REMEDIES

15 Defendants. 21-DAY DEADLINE 16 17 Plaintiff Mario Rene Arreguin is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights 18 action. In his complaint, Plaintiff indicates that he has not appealed his grievances or requests for 19 relief to the highest level for any of his three claims. (Doc. 1 at 3-5.) 20 The Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA) provides that “[n]o action shall be brought with 21 respect to prison conditions under . . . any other Federal law . . . by a prisoner confined in any jail, 22 prison, or other correctional facility until such administrative remedies as are available are 23 exhausted.” 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a). Exhaustion of administrative remedies is mandatory and 24 “unexhausted claims cannot be brought in court.” Jones v. Bock,…