Rippy
Rippy v. County of Sacramento
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
|iPoRTER | SCOTT 2 |] APROFESSIONAL CORPORATION Carl L. Fessenden, SBN 161494 3 |] William E. Camy, SBN 291397 Megan N. Boelter, SBN 340235 4 350 University Avenue, Suite 200 5 Sacramento, California 95825
TEL: 916.929.1481
6 || FAX: 916.927.3706 cfessenden@porterscott.com 7 || wcamy@porterscott.com mboelter@porterscott.com 8 Attorneys for Defendant 9 || COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO 10 Exempt from filing fee pursuant to Government Code section 6103
11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12 13 14 DANIEL RIPPY, Case No.: 2:22-ev-01511-TLN-DMC 1S Plaintiff, STIPULATION AND PROTECTIVE ORDER 16
VS.
17 || COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO and DOES 1 TO Complaint Filed: 8/26/22 ig 19 Defendants. 20 ee 21 22 23 Plaintiff DANIEL RIPPY (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO 24 || (“Defendant”), by and through their respective counsels, hereby stipulate and in good faith believe that 25 || documents potentially within the scope of discovery for the instant matter, including but not limited to the 26 || documents identified below…