Hafer
Hafer v. Farmers Insurance Agency
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 DeCHERI HAFER, Case No. 1:22-cv-00808-AWI-SKO 13 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION TO
DISMISS FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION
14 v. (Docs. 11 & 15) 15 FARMERS INSURANCE AGENCY, 21-DAY DEADLINE 16 Defendant.
17 18 I. INTRODUCTION 19 Plaintiff DeCheri Hafer is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action. Plaintiff 20 filed her complaint in the United States District Court for the Central District of California June 21, 21 2022. (Doc. 1). The case was transferred, sua sponte, to this Court on June 30, 2022. (See Doc. 22 8.) 23 On June 8, 2022, the undersigned screened the complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) 24 and found that it failed to state any cognizable claims over which this Court would have subject 25 matter jurisdiction. (Doc. 11.) Specifically, the undersigned found that, although Plaintiff brought 26 this action based on diversity jurisdiction, Plaintiff’s alleged $2 billion amount in controversy was 27 …