Gastelum
Gastelum v. Bed Bath & Beyond, Inc.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10
11 FERNANDO GASTELUM Case No. 1:22-cv-01173-ADA-CDB
12 Plaintiff,
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY
SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED
13 v.
FOR THE PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO
PROSECUTE THIS ACTION AND TO
14 BED BATH & BEYOND, INC.,
COMPLY WITH THE COURT’S ORDERS;
ORDER CONTINUING THE MANDATORY
15 Defendant.
SCHEDULING CONFERENCE
16
TEN-DAY DEADLINE
17
18 Plaintiff Fernando Gastelum filed a complaint in this action on September 14, 2022. 19 (ECF No. 1.) On September 28, 2022, the Clerk of Court issued a summons and the Court 20 entered an Order setting a mandatory scheduling conference. (ECF Nos. 3, 4.) The Order 21 directed Plaintiff to “diligently pursue service of summons and complaint” and “promptly file 22 proofs of service.” The Order further advised Plaintiff that failure to diligently prosecute this 23 action “may result in the imposition of sanctions, including the dismissal of unserved 24 defendants.” To date, Plaintiff has not filed proofs of service, and the defendants have not 25 appeared in the action. 26 …