Gastelum

Gastelum v. Bed Bath & Beyond, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 9, 20221:22-cv-01173California431 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10

11 FERNANDO GASTELUM Case No. 1:22-cv-01173-ADA-CDB

12 Plaintiff,

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY

SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED

13 v.

FOR THE PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO

PROSECUTE THIS ACTION AND TO

14 BED BATH & BEYOND, INC.,

COMPLY WITH THE COURT’S ORDERS;

ORDER CONTINUING THE MANDATORY

15 Defendant.

SCHEDULING CONFERENCE

16

TEN-DAY DEADLINE

17

18 Plaintiff Fernando Gastelum filed a complaint in this action on September 14, 2022. 19 (ECF No. 1.) On September 28, 2022, the Clerk of Court issued a summons and the Court 20 entered an Order setting a mandatory scheduling conference. (ECF Nos. 3, 4.) The Order 21 directed Plaintiff to “diligently pursue service of summons and complaint” and “promptly file 22 proofs of service.” The Order further advised Plaintiff that failure to diligently prosecute this 23 action “may result in the imposition of sanctions, including the dismissal of unserved 24 defendants.” To date, Plaintiff has not filed proofs of service, and the defendants have not 25 appeared in the action. 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.