(HC) Sho v. S.F. Field Office, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 9, 20221:21-cv-01812California1,490 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 MONSURU WOLE SHO, No. 1:21-cv-1812 TLN AC P 11 Petitioner, 12 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 13 CURRENT OR ACTING FIELD OFFICE

DIRECTOR, SAN FRANCISCO FIELD

14 OFFICE, UNITED STATES

IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS

15 ENFORCEMENT, et al. 16 Respondents. 17 18 Petitioner, a federal immigration detainee proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a 19 writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. ECF No. 1. The matter was referred to a 20 United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 21 Respondents have filed a motion to dismiss this action on the grounds that the petition is 22 duplicative of the one filed in Sho v. U.S. Immigration and Custom Enforcement, No. 2:21-cv- 23 0654 TLN AC P (“Sho I”), and that petitioner accordingly has abused the writ. ECF Nos. 27, 28. 24 Petitioner has not filed objections to the motion, and the period within which to file a reply has 25 passed. Thus, the matter is deemed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.