Corter

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID ARKEEM EVANS, Case No. 2:22-cv-01377-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS

CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR

v. FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND FAILURE

TO STATE A CLAIM

CORTER, et al.,

RESPONSE DUE WITHIN TWENTY-ONE

Defendants. DAYS 16 On October 4, 2022, the court screened plaintiff’s complaint and notified him that it alleged cognizable Eighth Amendment excessive force claims against defendants Corter and Martin, but that the other claims were not adequately pled. ECF No. 8. The court gave plaintiff thirty days to file an amended complaint or advise the court if he wished to stand by his current complaint and proceed only with his Eighth Amendment excessive force claims against Corter and Martin. Id. at 3-4. To date, plaintiff has not filed either an amended complaint or a notice of election to proceed on the cognizable claims. To manage its docket effectively, the court requires litigants…