Corter

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DAVID ARKEEM EVANS, Case No. 2:22-cv-01377-JDP (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS

CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR

13 v. FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND FAILURE

TO STATE A CLAIM

14 CORTER, et al.,

RESPONSE DUE WITHIN TWENTY-ONE

15 Defendants. DAYS 16 17 On October 4, 2022, the court screened plaintiff’s complaint and notified him that it 18 alleged cognizable Eighth Amendment excessive force claims against defendants Corter and 19 Martin, but that the other claims were not adequately pled. ECF No. 8. The court gave plaintiff 20 thirty days to file an amended complaint or advise the court if he wished to stand by his current 21 complaint and proceed only with his Eighth Amendment excessive force claims against Corter 22 and Martin. Id. at 3-4. To date, plaintiff has not filed either an amended complaint or a notice of 23 election to proceed on the cognizable claims. 24 To manage its docket effectively, the court requires litigants…