Vaughan

Vaughan v. Ornales

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 9, 20221:20-cv-00941California2,277 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 J.G., A.G., A.P., and L.P., in each case by Case No. 1:20-cv-00941-JLT-CDB and through their guardian ad litem, Maria 12 Pantoja, individually and as a successor in FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS interest to Richard Posadas, deceased, and RECOMMENDING GRANTING EX 13 LOURDES VAUGHAN, individually, PARTE APPLICATION FOR

COMPROMISE OF MINORS’ CLAIMS

14 Plaintiffs,

15 v. (ECF No. 24)

16 CITY OF ARVIN; KEVIN

ARCHULETA; ALDO ORNALES;

17 PATRICIA STEWART, 18 Defendants. 19 20 On November 11, 2022, plaintiffs J.G., A.G., A.P., and L.P., by and through their 21 guardian ad litem (GAL), Maria Pantoja, and Lourdes Vaughan (Plaintiffs), filed an unopposed 22 Ex Parte Application for Approval of Compromise of the Claims of Minor Plaintiffs. (ECF No. 23 24.) On November 17, 2022, the Court ordered Plaintiffs to submit additional briefing in support 24 for their application. On December 1, 2022, Plaintiffs filed a supplement pursuant to the Court’s 25 Order. (ECF No. 27.) The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.