Wallace
(PC) Kahaku v. Wallace
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DANIEL KAHAKU, No. 2:20-cv-1807 KJN P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 K. WALLACE, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se, in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. 18 § 1983. On June 28, 2022, defendants were directed to submit certain documents for in camera 19 review. (ECF No. 39.) Defendants submitted such documents and filed a notice of compliance 20 confirming that certain discovery responses do not exist. (ECF No. 42.) The court has completed 21 the in camera review. 22 As set forth below, plaintiff’s motion to compel further production of documents in 23 response to request no. 2 is partially granted, and plaintiff is granted an extension of time to 24 oppose the pending motion for summary judgment. 25 Plaintiff’s Complaint 26 This action proceeds on plaintiff’s allegations that while he was housed at Mule Creek 27 State Prison, defendants K. Wallace, A. Bustamante, T. Freitas, J. Vina, E. Speer, J.…