(PC)Martin
(PC)Martin v. Pogue
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JARED ANDREW MARTIN, Case No. 1:22-cv-00560-ADA-HBK (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION 13 v. (Doc. No. 13) 14 TYSON J. POGUE, ET. AL., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for order to return property filed on 18 September 9, 2022. (Doc. No. 13). Plaintiff states Madera County Jail officials violated his 19 Fourth Amendment rights when they took away his “legal materials” and “legal property” upon 20 his arrival at the county jail. (Id. at 1). Plaintiff states the property was removed even though jail 21 officials knew it was evidence related to his “criminal and civil cases.” (Id.). Plaintiff seeks an 22 order from court to direct unidentified county jail officials to return the legal documents that he 23 states contain “exculpatory evidence.” (Id. at 1-2). 24 The courts liberally construe pro se pleadings. Wilhelm v. Rotman, 680 F.3d 1113, 1121 25 (9th Cir. 2012). Liberally construing the…