(SS) Bandong v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 14, 20222:21-cv-00318California3,210 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RONALDO PATINO BANDONG, No. 2:21-cv-318-KJN Plaintiff, ORDER v. (ECF Nos. 17, 19.) COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL

SECURITY,

15 Defendant. 16 Plaintiff seeks judicial review of a final decision by the Commissioner of Social Security denying his application for Disability Insurance Benefits. In his summary judgment motion, plaintiff contends the Administrative Law Judge erred in: (A) resolving the opinions of two of plaintiff’s doctors regarding his physical and mental impairments; and (B) disregarding plaintiff’s pain testimony. Plaintiff seeks a remand for a grant of benefits or for further proceedings. The Commissioner opposed, filed a cross-motion for summary judgment, and seeks affirmance. For the reasons that follow, the court GRANTS plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, DENIES the Commissioner’s cross-motion, and REMANDS the final decision of the Commissioner for further proceedings. /// 27 1 This action was referred to the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.