Hill

(PC) Davis v. Hill

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 14, 20222:22-cv-00407California1,170 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 LLOYD CLIFTON DAVIS, Case No. 2:22-cv-00407-JDP (PC) 11 Plaintiff, SCREENING ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF: 12 v. (1) STAND BY HIS COMPLAINT

SUBJECT TO A

13 RICK HILL, et al., RECOMMENDATION OF

DISMISSAL OF CLAIMS AND

14 Defendants. PARTIES, OR 15 (2) FILE A THIRD AMENDED

COMPLAINT

16 ECF No. 12 17

THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE

18

19 20 21 Plaintiff, a state prisoner, brings various claims related to interference with his mail. 22 These claims, described below, cannot proceed jointly, and I will give plaintiff a final opportunity 23 to amend his complaint so that includes only related claims. If he declines to file an amended 24 complaint, I will permit his first viable claim to proceed past screening and will recommend that 25 other unrelated parties and claims be dismissed. 26 27 28 1 Screening Order 2 I. Screening and Pleading Requirements 3 A federal court must screen…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.