Hill
(PC) Davis v. Hill
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 LLOYD CLIFTON DAVIS, Case No. 2:22-cv-00407-JDP (PC) 11 Plaintiff, SCREENING ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF: 12 v. (1) STAND BY HIS COMPLAINT
SUBJECT TO A
13 RICK HILL, et al., RECOMMENDATION OF
DISMISSAL OF CLAIMS AND
14 Defendants. PARTIES, OR 15 (2) FILE A THIRD AMENDED
COMPLAINT
16 ECF No. 12 17
THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE
18
19 20 21 Plaintiff, a state prisoner, brings various claims related to interference with his mail. 22 These claims, described below, cannot proceed jointly, and I will give plaintiff a final opportunity 23 to amend his complaint so that includes only related claims. If he declines to file an amended 24 complaint, I will permit his first viable claim to proceed past screening and will recommend that 25 other unrelated parties and claims be dismissed. 26 27 28 1 Screening Order 2 I. Screening and Pleading Requirements 3 A federal court must screen…