(PS) Sanders v. Sacramento Sheriff's Department
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SASSUS SANDERS, No. 2:22-cv-1232-TLN-CKD PS 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 SACRAMENTO SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT, et al., 15 Defendants. 16
17 18 Plaintiff filed a pro se complaint, and then a first amended complaint, seeking relief under 19 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to the undersigned by Local Rule 302(c)(21) pursuant 20 to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). 21 By order signed and filed on October 24, 2022 (ECF No. 5), the undersigned screened the 22 first amended complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e), advised plaintiff of the deficiencies in 23 the first amended complaint, and granted plaintiff thirty days to file a further amended complaint. 24 Plaintiff was warned that failure to file a further amended complaint would result in a 25 recommendation that this action be dismissed. The time granted for plaintiff to file a further 26 amended complaint has expired. Plaintiff has neither filed a further amended complaint nor 27 sought an extension of…