(PS) Sanders v. Sacramento Sheriff's Department

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 15, 20222:22-cv-01232California396 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SASSUS SANDERS, No. 2:22-cv-1232-TLN-CKD PS Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SACRAMENTO SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT, et al., 15 Defendants.

17 Plaintiff filed a pro se complaint, and then a first amended complaint, seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to the undersigned by Local Rule 302(c)(21) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). By order signed and filed on October 24, 2022 (ECF No. 5), the undersigned screened the first amended complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e), advised plaintiff of the deficiencies in the first amended complaint, and granted plaintiff thirty days to file a further amended complaint. Plaintiff was warned that failure to file a further amended complaint would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The time granted for plaintiff to file a further amended complaint has expired. Plaintiff has neither filed a further amended complaint nor sought an extension of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.