Thompson

(HC) Mohammad v. Thompson

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 15, 20222:21-cv-02162California376 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KAIS MOHAMMAD, No. 2:21-cv-02162-TLN-CKD 12 Petitioner, 13 v. ORDER 14 PAUL THOMPSON, et al., 15 Respondents. 16 17 Petitioner, a federal prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of 18 habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The matter was referred to a United States 19 Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On September 27, 2022, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 21 which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to 22 the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed 23 objections to the findings and recommendations. 24 Although it appears from the file that petitioner’s copy of the findings and 25 recommendations was returned, petitioner was properly served. It is the petitioner’s 26 responsibility to keep the court apprised of his current address at all times. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.