Holmberg

Ncontracts, LLC v. Holmberg

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 15, 20221:22-cv-01608California6,924 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE

NASHVILLE DIVISION

NCONTRACTS LLC., )

) Plaintiff, ) ) NO. 3:22-cv-00868 v. ) JUDGE RICHARDSON )

RYAN HOLMBERG, )

) Defendant. ) )

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for a temporary restraining order (“TRO”). (Doc. No. 6). Defendant filed a response to the motion for a TRO (Doc. No. 18) as well as a motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction and improper venue (Doc. No. 17). On November 8, 2022, the Court issued an order explaining that it would resolve Defendant’s motion to dismiss before addressing the motion for a TRO because Defendant had raised colorable issues of personal jurisdiction and venue. For the reasons stated herein, Defendant’s motion to dismiss is GRANTED, and this action is transferred to the Eastern District of California.

FACTS1

Ncontracts is a compliance and risk management and solutions company headquartered in Brentwood, Tennessee. (Doc. No. 1 at 5–6). Although many of Ncontracts’ vital corporate

1 Unless indicated otherwise (as for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.