Hernandez Gomez v. The GEO Group, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 16, 20221:22-cv-00868California2,439 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOSE HERNANDEZ GOMEZ, et al. Case No. 1:22-cv-00868-ADA-CDB

12 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR LEAVE

TO FILE A SECOND AMENDED

13 v. COMPLAINT 14 THE GEO GROUP, INC. (ECF No. 36) 15 Defendant. 16

17 18 Before this Court is Plaintiffs Jose Ruben Hernandez Gomez, Salesh Prasad, Guillermo 19 Medina Reyes, Edgar Sanchez, Adan Castillo Merino, Oliva Sierra Ivan, Fidel Garcia, Issac 20 Cardona Hernandez, and Pedro Jesus Figueroa Padilla’s (“Plaintiffs”) motion to file a second 21 amended complaint (ECF No. 36), Defendant The Geo Group, Inc.’s (“Defendant”) opposition 22 (ECF No. 42), and Plaintiffs’ reply (ECF No. 43). For the reasons explained herein, Plaintiffs’ 23 motion to file a second amended complaint shall be granted. 24 Background 25 On July 13, 2022, Plaintiffs filed a complaint for declaratory and injunctive relief and 26 damages against Defendant. (ECF No. 1). Plaintiffs asserted six causes of action against 27 Defendant including a representative action…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.