(PC) Gray v. Clark

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 16, 20221:20-cv-00196California6,160 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10

11 THOMAS EUGENE GRAY, ) Case No.: 1:20-cv-00196-JLT-SAB (PC) ) 12 Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN 13 v. ) PART PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST TO AMEND ) AMENDED PRETRIAL ORDER 14 KEN CLARK, et.al., ) ) (Doc. 90) 15 Defendants. ) ) Deadlines: 16 ) Motions in Limine Filing: Nov. 14, 2022 ) Oppositions to Motions in Limine: Dec. 9, 2022 17 ) ) Jury Trial: Feb. 13, 2023, at 8:30 a.m., 2-3 days 18

19 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action 20 brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Siefken, Jennings-Sedillo, and Hurtado. Plaintiff claims 21 that despite prior warnings, Siefken and Hurtado failed to protect him from being assaulted by other 22 inmates at Corcoran State Prison and that Jennings-Sedillo used excessive force when she shot him 23 with a 40mm round while he was already on the ground. 24 On…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.