Shah

(PC) Armenta v. Shah

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 19, 20222:22-cv-00415California1,957 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RICHARD ARMENTA, Case No. 2:22-cv-00415-JDP (PC) 12 Plaintiff, SCREENING ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF: 13 v. (1) FILE AN AMENDED

COMPLAINT; OR

14 SHAH, et al., (2) STAND BY HIS COMPLAINT 15 Defendants. SUBJECT TO A

RECOMMENDATION THAT IT BE

16 DISMISSED 17 ECF No. 22 18 THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE 19 20 Plaintiff Richard Armenta, a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in this civil rights 21 action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleges that defendants violated his Eighth Amendment right to 22 adequate medical care. ECF No. 22. I previously screened plaintiff’s complaint and found that 23 his allegations failed to state a cognizable claim for relief. ECF No. 21. His first amended 24 complaint fares no better. I will give plaintiff one final opportunity to cure the defects in his 25 complaint before recommending that his complaint be dismissed without leave…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.