Shah
(PC) Armenta v. Shah
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RICHARD ARMENTA, Case No. 2:22-cv-00415-JDP (PC) 12 Plaintiff, SCREENING ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF: 13 v. (1) FILE AN AMENDED
COMPLAINT; OR
14 SHAH, et al., (2) STAND BY HIS COMPLAINT 15 Defendants. SUBJECT TO A
RECOMMENDATION THAT IT BE
16 DISMISSED 17 ECF No. 22 18 THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE 19 20 Plaintiff Richard Armenta, a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in this civil rights 21 action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleges that defendants violated his Eighth Amendment right to 22 adequate medical care. ECF No. 22. I previously screened plaintiff’s complaint and found that 23 his allegations failed to state a cognizable claim for relief. ECF No. 21. His first amended 24 complaint fares no better. I will give plaintiff one final opportunity to cure the defects in his 25 complaint before recommending that his complaint be dismissed without leave…