Acebedo

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JESUS BONILLA CASTANEDA, Case No.: 1:16-cv-01562-JLT-SKO (PC)

12 Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING IN PART AND

DECLINING TO ADOPT IN PART

13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

REGARDING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION

14 SHERMAN, et al., FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

15 Defendants. (Doc. 92)

16 17 In his first amended complaint, the plaintiff proceeds on a claim of deliberate indifference 18 to serious risk of harm under the Eighth Amendment. (See Docs. 13 & 20.) The assigned 19 magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations to deny Defendants’ motion for summary 20 judgment. (Doc. 92.) Following an extension of time, Defendants timely filed their objections. 21 (Doc. 97.) 22 According to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de novo review of this 23 case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, including Defendants’ objections, the Court 24 ADOPTS in part and DECLINES to adopt in part the findings and recommendations. Defendants 25 did not…