(PC) Gonzales v. United States

Bad Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 19, 20221:21-cv-01053California544 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ANTONIO GONZALES, Case No. 1:21-cv-01053-ADA-CDB (PC)

12 Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION

SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR

13 v. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH COURT

ORDER

14 UNITED STATES, et al., (Doc. 11) 15 Defendants.

16 TWENTY-ONE (21) DAY DEADLINE 17 18 Plaintiff Antonio Gonzalez is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis 19 in this civil action asserting a claim under the Federal Torts Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2671– 20 2680. On November 11, 2022, the Court issued a screening order finding that Plaintiff’s 21 complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. (Doc. 11.) The Court directed 22 Plaintiff, within thirty days, to file a first amended complaint curing the deficiencies in his 23 pleading. (Id.) The Court warned Plaintiff: “If Plaintiff fails to comply with this order, the 24 Court will recommend that this action be dismissed for failure to state a claim,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.