Loterzstain

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SHELDON RAY NEWSOME, Case No. 2:19-cv-00307-DAD-JDP (PC) 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

THAT PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE

13 v. TO AMEND BE DENIED AND THAT

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR

14 M. LOTERZSTAIN, et al., CLARIFICATION BE DENIED 15 Defendants. ECF Nos. 84 & 94 16 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY

SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED

17 FOR FAILURE TO TIMELY FILE A

RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S SPOLIATION

18 MOTION 19 ECF No. 97 20 FOURTEEN-DAY DEADLINE FOR

OBJECTIONS AND TO SHOW CAUSE

21 22 Plaintiff filed the operative second amended complaint on September 19, 2019, alleging 23 that defendants violated his First and Eighth Amendment rights by retaliating against him and 24 denying him adequate medical care. ECF No. 18. In November 2020, I issued a scheduling order 25 …