Nevis

Nevis v. Rideout Memorial Hospital

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 16, 20222:17-cv-02295California654 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOSEPH DANIEL NEVIS, No. 2:17-cv-02295-DAD-AC 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. NOTICE RE PROPOSED JUDGMENT 14 RIDEOUT MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, et al. 15 Defendants. 16

17 18 The jury in this action returned its verdict on October 28, 2022. Since then, at the request 19 of the parties, hearings have been held and briefing submitted addressing the precise language 20 that should be appropriately employed in entering judgment pursuant to the jury’s verdict. 21 However, because the parties’ positions on that issue remain somewhat unclear in the court’s 22 view, they will be provided a final opportunity to express any objection to the judgment language 23 the court intends to employ as set forth below. 24 * * * 25 PROPOSED JUDGMENT 26 The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter Judgment in this action in favor of plaintiff and 27 against defendants as to all of plaintiff’s claims, according to the verdict of the trial jury returned 28 in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.