Gastelum
Gastelum v. Easiness LP
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11 FERNANDO GASTELUM, Case No. 1:22-cv-00166-ADA-CDB
12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS THAT
THIS ACTION BE DISMISSED WITHOUT
13 v. PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO PROPERLY
SERVE DEFENDANT, FAILURE TO PROSECUTE
14 EASINESS LP, AND FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH A COURT
ORDER
15 Defendant.
OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, ARE DUE WITHIN
16 TWENTY-ONE DAYS.
17 (ECF No. 20)
18
19 Background and Procedural History 20 Plaintiff Fernando Gastelum (“Plaintiff”) proceeding pro se initiated this action against 21 Defendant Easiness LP (“Defendant”) on February 8, 2022. (ECF No. 1). On February 10, 2022, the 22 Court set an initial scheduling conference for May 26, 2022, and advised Plaintiff he “shall diligently 23 pursue service of summons and complaint…” (ECF No. 5). 24 On May 10, 2022, Plaintiff filed an affidavit of non-service describing a process server’s 25 unsuccessful attempt to serve Defendant…