Gastelum

Gastelum v. Easiness LP

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 19, 20221:22-cv-00166California2,229 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3

4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

11 FERNANDO GASTELUM, Case No. 1:22-cv-00166-ADA-CDB

12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS THAT

THIS ACTION BE DISMISSED WITHOUT

13 v. PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO PROPERLY

SERVE DEFENDANT, FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

14 EASINESS LP, AND FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH A COURT

ORDER

15 Defendant.

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, ARE DUE WITHIN

16 TWENTY-ONE DAYS.

17 (ECF No. 20)

18

19 Background and Procedural History 20 Plaintiff Fernando Gastelum (“Plaintiff”) proceeding pro se initiated this action against 21 Defendant Easiness LP (“Defendant”) on February 8, 2022. (ECF No. 1). On February 10, 2022, the 22 Court set an initial scheduling conference for May 26, 2022, and advised Plaintiff he “shall diligently 23 pursue service of summons and complaint…” (ECF No. 5). 24 On May 10, 2022, Plaintiff filed an affidavit of non-service describing a process server’s 25 unsuccessful attempt to serve Defendant…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.