Southern

Southern v. City of Sacramento

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 20, 20222:20-cv-01765California1,061 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JIMMY SOUTHERN, individually and No. 2:20-cv-01765-MCE-AC as successor-in-interest to Decedent JEREMY SOUTHERN, Plaintiff, ORDER v. CITY OF SACRAMENTO, a municipal corporation; DRAKE WALKER, individually and in his capacity as a City of Sacramento Police Officer; and DOES 1–50, inclusive, Defendants. 19 Plaintiff Jimmy Southern (“Plaintiff”) brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Defendants City of Sacramento (the “City”) and police officer Drake Walker (“Walker”) (collectively, “Defendants”) based on the fatal shooting of Plaintiff’s brother, Jeremy Southern (“Decedent”), by Walker. Second Am. Compl., ECF No. 15 (“SAC”). Presently before the Court is Defendants’ Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. ECF No. 33. Plaintiff does not oppose this Motion. ECF No. 36. For the following reasons, Defendants’ Motion is GRANTED.1 27 1 Because oral argument would not have been of material assistance, the Court ordered this 28 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.