Macut
Macut v. Wabash National Corporation
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EMILY MACUT, a minor, by and Case No. 1:22-cv-00231-JLT-CDB through her guardian ad litem SARAH MEBANE, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION TO REMAND
Plaintiffs, (ECF No. 11) v. WABASH NATIONAL
CORPORATION, ET AL.,
16 Defendants. 17 18 19 Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand, filed March 15, 2022. (ECF No. 11, “Motion”). Defendant Wabash National Corporation (“Wabash”) filed an Opposition on March 24, 2022 (ECF No. 14, “Opposition”), to which Plaintiff filed a Reply on April 1, 2022. (ECF No. 17, “Reply”). On November 29, 2022, following consent of the parties, the Court referred Plaintiff’s pending Motion to be resolved by the undersigned. Pursuant to Local Rule 230(g), the Court deems the motion suitable for decision on the parties’ briefs and without oral argument. For the 27 1 Plaintiff’s Motion properly is before and decided by the undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A) & (c)(1) and Local Rule 302(a) (E.D. Cal. 2022)…