Thompson

Thompson v. Thompson

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 20, 20221:22-cv-00935California1,310 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

I. INTRODUCTION

16 On November 9, 2022, David Greenberg and Adrian F. LaPeyronnie, III of the law firm of Greenberg & LaPeyronnie, LLC (“Attorneys Greenberg and LaPeyronnie”), attorneys for Defendants Sheldon Thompson, Marie-Merced Thompson, and Skye Thompson (collectively, “Defendants”), filed a motion to withdraw. (Doc. 34.) On November 14, 2022, Edward John Rantz, Jr. of the law firm of Middleberg Riddle Group (“Attorney Rantz”), attorney for Plaintiff Romy Thompson (“Plaintiff”), filed a motion to withdraw. (Doc. 36.) Upon consideration of the motions, and for the reasons set forth below, Attorneys Greenberg and LaPeyronnie’s and Attorney Rantz’s motions to withdraw are DENIED without prejudice. II. BACKGROUND On June 14, 2021, Plaintiff initiated this action in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana. (See Doc. 1.) In the operative complaint, Plaintiff alleges that Defendants, her parents and brother, improperly withheld profits generated from a jointly owned business. (See id.) On July 27, 2022, the Eastern District of Louisiana granted…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.