Sherman

(PC) Shaheed v. Sherman

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 21, 20221:20-cv-01450California819 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KARRIEM SHAHEED, Case No. 1:20-cv-01450-ADA-SAB (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND GRANTING

v. DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT

S. SHERMAN, et al., (ECF Nos. 28, 40) Defendants.

15 Plaintiff Karriem Shaheed (“Plaintiff”) is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On August 25, 2022, the assigned United States Magistrate Judge issued findings and recommendations recommending Defendants’ motion for summary judgment for failure to exhaust the administrative remedies be denied and the motion for summary judgment on the merits be granted. (ECF No. 40.) The findings and recommendations were served on the parties and contained notice that any objections were to be filed within twenty-one (21) days after service. (Id. at 18.) After receiving…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.