Parker

(UD)(PS) Kim v. Parker

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 21, 20222:22-cv-02247California817 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHARLES KIM, No. 2:22-cv-02247-TLN-AC Plaintiff, v. SUA SPONTE REMAND ORDER KRYSTAL PARKER and DARNELL

CARD,

15 Defendants.

17 This matter is before the Court pursuant to Defendant Darnell Card’s (“Defendant”) 18 Notice of Removal and Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. (ECF Nos. 1–2.) For the reasons 19 set forth below, Defendant’s Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis is DENIED as moot, and the 20 Court hereby REMANDS the action to Placer County Superior Court due to lack of subject 21 matter jurisdiction. 22 /// 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 ///

Defendant Krystal Parker did not join in these filings. I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND On October 14, 2022, Plaintiff Charles Kim (“Plaintiff”) filed a First Amended Complaint in state court for this unlawful detainer action against Defendant for possession of real property known as 10001 Woodcreek Oaks Blvd, #625, Roseville, California, 95747 (the “Property”). (ECF No. 1 at 7.) On…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.