(PC) Foster v. Sacramento Parole Dept. North Highlands

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARTIN LEE FOSTER, No. 2:22-cv-1923 DAD CKD P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SACRAMENTO PAROLE DEPT. NORTH HIGHLANDS, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 On November 7, 2022, plaintiff was ordered to file a request to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the filing fee within thirty days and was cautioned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not responded to the court’s order. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a…