(PC) DeOllas v. County of Sacramento

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 21, 20222:22-cv-00906California3,047 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTHONY EUGENE DeOLLAS II, No. 2:22-cv-0906 DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., Defendants.

17 Plaintiff, an inmate at the Sacramento County Jail, proceeds without counsel and seeks relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to the undersigned by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Plaintiff’s complaint filed on May 26, 2022, is before the court for screening. The complaint’s allegations fail to state a claim. Plaintiff will be granted leave to file an amended complaint. I. In Forma Pauperis Plaintiff seeks to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF No. 2.) Plaintiff’s declaration makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). The motion is granted. II. Screening Requirement The court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The 1 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.