Oregon v. Boston Scientific Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 21, 20221:21-cv-01092California358 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ARACELY OREGON, Case No. 1:21-cv-01092-ADA-CDB

Plaintiff, ORDER ON STIPULATION AMENDING

SCHEDULING ORDER AS MODIFIED

v. (ECF No. 32) BOSTON SCIENTIFIC

CORPORATION.

15 Defendant. 16 Plaintiff initiated this action by filing a Complaint on July 15, 2021. (ECF No. 1). In the operative, First Amended Complaint filed June 16, 2022, Plaintiff asserts causes of action for strict liability and negligence. (ECF No. 20). On July 6, 2022, the Court convened the parties for a scheduling conference and thereafter issued a Scheduling Order. (ECF Nos. 27, 28). On December 20, 2022, the parties filed a stipulation seeking a 90-day extension of the discovery, motion and trial schedule. (ECF No. 32). The stipulation seeking an extension is timely filed pursuant to Local Rule 144(d) and the parties’ representations therein satisfy the requirements under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(4) to show good cause and diligence. See Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc., 975 F.2d…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.