Garza

Garza v. City of Visalia

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 22, 20221:21-cv-01203California1,043 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MICHAEL GARZA, Case No. 1:21-cv-01203-SAB

Plaintiff, ORDER RE: INFORMAL DISCOVERY

DISPUTE

v. (ECF Nos. 27, 28, 29) CITY OF VISALIA, Defendant. 16 17 18 On December 21, 2022, the parties filed a joint informal discovery dispute letter brief. (ECF No. 28.) Plaintiff seeks to modify the scheduling order (ECF No. 18) to continue all deadlines to allow for Plaintiff’s concurrent criminal trial to resolve. (ECF No. 28.) An informal videoconference was held on December 22, 2022, to address the dispute. Counsel Kaveh Navab appeared for Plaintiff Michael Garza, and counsel Leonard Charles Herr and Caren Lynn Curtiss appeared for Defendants City of Visalia, Officer Mudo, Chris Fernandes, Samantha Gonzales, and Anthony Chandler. The Court notes this matter was conducted off the record; however, the parties were afforded an opportunity to place the matter on the record and no party requested to do so. For the reasons discussed herein, Plaintiff’s request to modify the scheduling…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.