Diaz

(HC) Kirkland v. Diaz

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 21, 20222:21-cv-02018California416 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TREVON R. KIRKLAND, No. 2:21-cv-02018 DB P Petitioner, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

DIAZ, et al., Respondents. 16 Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus under § 2254. Petitioner has not paid the filing fee for the present action or been given leave by the court to proceed in forma pauperis. By an order filed May 25, 2022, the court denied petitioner’s request to proceed in forma pauperis, finding that, based on the affidavit, petitioner was able to pay the filing fee. (ECF No. 8.) Petitioner was ordered to pay the filing fee for the present action within twenty-one days. (Id. at 2.) Petitioner was cautioned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. (Id.) The twenty-one day period has now expired, and petitioner has not paid the filing fee, requested an extension of time to do so, or otherwise responded…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.