(PS) Van Den Heuvel v. Walmart Super Store

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 21, 20222:22-cv-00249California1,031 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JEAN MARC VAN DEN HEUVEL, Case No. 2:22-cv-00249-TLN-JDP (PS) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA

v. PAUPERIS WALMART SUPER STORE, et al., ECF No. 2 Defendants. SCREENING ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF: (1) STAND BY HIS COMPLAINT

SUBJECT TO DISMISSAL, OR

17 (2) FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT 18 ECF No. 1

THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE

20 Plaintiff filed a complaint purporting to assert claims against Walmart Super Store and attorney Karen Roberts, together with an application to proceed in forma pauperis. His complaint, however, fails to state a claim. I will give plaintiff a chance to amend his complaint before recommending dismissal. I will also grant his application to proceed in forma pauperis, ECF No. 2, which makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(a)(1) and (2). Screening and Pleading Requirements A complaint must contain a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.