(PC) Young v. Clark

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 23, 20221:22-cv-01219California4,669 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 TYRONE POWELL YOUNG, Case No. 1:22-cv-01219-JLT-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

REGARDING DISMISSAL OF CERTAIN

v. CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS

CLARK, et al., (ECF Nos. 1, 23, 25)

Defendants. FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE 15 I. Background Plaintiff Tyrone Powell Young (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On August 19, 2022, the Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint and found that Plaintiff stated cognizable claims against Defendants J. Webb, A. Loza, J. Flores, and the 5 John Doe Defendants for excessive force in violation of the Eighth Amendment, but failed to state any other cognizable claims for relief against any other defendants. (ECF No. 23.) The Court ordered Plaintiff to either file a first amended complaint or notify the Court of his willingness to proceed only on the cognizable claims identified by the Court.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.