Vera-Brown

(PC) Gann v. Vera-Brown

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 23, 20221:18-cv-00084California438 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 NATHANIEL MARCUS GANN, Case No. 1:18-cv-0084-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS

ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED

v. FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE VERA-BROWN, TWENTY-ONE (21) DAY DEADLINE Defendant. 16 Plaintiff Nathaniel Marcus Gann (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s second amended complaint against Defendant Vera-Brown (“Defendant”) for deliberate indifference to serious medical needs in violation of the Eighth Amendment. All parties have consented to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (ECF No. 52.) On September 29, 2022, the Court issued an order granting Defendant’s motion to vacate scheduling order, pending resolution of Defendant’s motion for summary judgment on the ground that Plaintiff failed to exhaust his administrative remedies prior to filing suit. (ECF No. 69.) On October 17,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.