Pfieffer

(PC) Stone v. Pfieffer

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 23, 20221:21-cv-01461California668 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ADAM JAY STONE, Case No. 1:21-cv-01461-ADA-SAB (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR RECONSIDERATION OF THE

v. COURT’S DECEMBER 12, 2022 ORDER

C. PFEIFFER, et al., (ECF No. 68) Defendants.

15 Plaintiff Adam Jay Stone is proceeding pro se in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On December 8, 2022, Plaintiff filed a motion for confidential settlement negotiations with Defendants. (ECF No. 63.) On December 12, 2022, the Court denied Plaintiff’s motion, without prejudice, and advised him that he was free to reach engage in settlement negotiations with Defendants and the Court will set a settlement conference if all parties agree that it would be beneficial. (ECF No. 65.) Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration of the Court’s December 12, 2022, order, filed on December 19, 2022. Plaintiff contends that the Court failed to consider his claim that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.