Houff

Houff v. City of Sacramento

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 20, 20222:22-cv-01150California952 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHARLES HOUFF, individually and as No. 2:22-cv-01150-MCE-JDP successor-in-interest to Decedent Amelian Houff, et al., Plaintiffs, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER v. CITY OF SACRAMENTO, et al, Defendants. 17 Through the present action, Plaintiffs Charles and Olivia Houff, individually and as successors-in-interest to Decedent Amelian Houff (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), seek to recover from Defendants City of Sacramento and County of Sacramento (collectively, “Defendants”) for injuries sustained when Amelian was involved in a car accident that followed a high-speed pursuit by City of Sacramento police officers. Presently before the Court is the County of Sacramento’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ claims against it for failure to state a claim. ECF No. 12.

1 On a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), all allegations of material fact must be accepted as true and construed in the light most favorable to the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.