(PC) Rodriguez v. Solano State Prison

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTONIO RODRIGUEZ, No. 2:21-cv-00622 DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER WARDEN, SOLANO STATE PRISON, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, an inmate proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff claims defendants were deliberately indifferent to plaintiff’s serious medical needs in violation of his Eighth Amendment rights. Presently before the court is plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”) for screening. (ECF No. 21.) For the reasons set forth below, the court will give plaintiff the option of proceeding on his cognizable claims or being given leave to file an amended complaint. //// //// //// //// //// //// SCREENING I. Legal Standards The court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a governmental entity or an officer or employee of a governmental entity. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The court…