Crownholm

Crownholm v. Moore

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 27, 20222:22-cv-01720California9,642 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RYAN CROWNHOLM, et al., No. 2:22-cv-01720-DAD-CKD Plaintiffs, v. ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION

FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

RICHARD B. MOORE, et al., (Doc. No. 12) Defendants.

17 This matter came before the court on December 6, 2022 for a hearing on a motion for a preliminary injunction filed on October 18, 2022 on behalf of Ryan Crownholm and Crown Capital Adventures, Inc. (“plaintiffs”) seeking declaratory and injunctive relief against Richard B. Moore, Rossana D’Antonio, Michael Hartley, Fel Amistad, Alireza Asgari, Duane Friel, Kathy Jones Irish, Coby King, Elizabeth Mathieson, Paul Novak, Mohammad Qureshi, Frank Ruffino, Wilfredo Sanchez, and Christina Wong (“defendants”), in their official capacities as officers and members of the California Board for Professional Engineers, Land Surveyors, and Geologists (the “Board”). (Doc. No. 12.) Attorney Paul Avelar appeared by video for plaintiffs. Deputy Attorney General…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.