Arrizola

(PC) Brooks v. Arrizola

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 28, 20221:20-cv-00476California461 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LAMAR BROOKS, Case No. 1:20-cv-0476 JLT GSA (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS, DISMISSING THE

v. ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE, AND

DIRECTING THE CLERK OF COURT TO

ARRIZOLA, et al., CLOSE THIS CASE Defendants. (Doc. 9) 16 Lamar Brooks initiated this action as a state prisoner proceeding pro se by filing a civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. §1983. (Doc. 1.) Defendant Arrizola filed a motion for summary judgment, after which the Court ordered Plaintiff to file an opposition or statement of non-opposition within 30 days. (Doc. 37.) However, the Court’s mail was returned as undeliverable. The magistrate judge determined Plaintiff failed to comply with the Court’s order dated September 16, 2022. (Doc. 40.) Therefore, the magistrate judge recommended the action be dismissed without prejudice. (Id. at 2-3.) The Findings and Recommendations were served on all 25 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.