(PS) Rivera v. CA Community Housing Agency

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 27, 20222:22-cv-00346California3,011 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GEORGE RIVERA; CARMEN No. 2:22-cv-0346 DAD DB PS

MARTINEZ,

12 Plaintiffs, ORDER v. CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY HOUSING AGENCY, et al., 16 Defendants. 18 Plaintiffs George Rivera and Carmen Martinez are proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Pending before the undersigned are defendants’ motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and plaintiffs’ motion for an extension of time. (ECF Nos. 5 & 9.) For the reasons stated below, defendants’ motion to dismiss is granted and plaintiffs are granted leave to file a second amended complaint. BACKGROUND Plaintiffs, proceeding pro se, commenced this action on February 22, 2022, by filing a complaint and paying the applicable filing fee. (ECF No. 1.) Plaintiffs are proceeding on an amended complaint filed on May 6, 2022. (ECF…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.