(PS) Bowman v. County of Tehama

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BRIAN E. BOWMAN, No. 2:21-CV-0225-TLN-DMC Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS COUNTY OF TEHAMA, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, brings this civil action. On November 3, 2022, the Court directed Plaintiff to file an amended complaint within 30 days. Plaintiff was warned that failure to comply may result in dismissal of this action for lack of prosecution and failure to comply with court rules and orders. See Local Rule 110. More than 30 days have elapsed and Plaintiff has not complied. The Court must weigh five factors before imposing the harsh sanction of dismissal. See Bautista v. Los Angeles County, 216 F.3d 837, 841 (9th Cir. 2000); Malone v. U.S. Postal Service, 833 F.2d 128, 130 (9th Cir. 1987). Those factors are: (1) the public's interest in expeditious resolution of litigation; (2) the court's need to manage its own docket; (3) the risk of 26 …