Marohn

Marohn v. Yu

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 29, 20221:22-cv-01070California6,502 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NATHAN MAROHN, Case No. 1:22-cv-01070-ADA-SAB

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

RECOMMENDING GRANTING

v. PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR DEFAULT

JUDGMENT

QINGJUN YU,

ORDER REQUIRING SERVICE ON

Defendant. DEFENDANT WITHIN THREE DAYS

(ECF No. 10)

OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN

DAYS

19 I. INTRODUCTION Currently before the Court is Plaintiff Nathan Marohn’s (“Plaintiff”) motion for default judgment, filed on November 18, 2022. (ECF No. (“Mot.”).) Plaintiff seeks default judgment against Defendant Qingjun Yu (“Defendant”). No opposition to the motion was filed. On December 28, 2022, the Court held a hearing on the motion for default judgment. Joel B. Ard appeared by videoconference on behalf of Plaintiff. No appearance was made on behalf of Defendant. Having considered the moving papers, the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.