Rodriguez

Rodriguez v. USF Reddaway, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 30, 20222:22-cv-00210California3,707 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CARLOS RODRIGUEZ, individually, and No. 2:22-cv-00210-TLN-DB on behalf of other aggrieved employees pursuant to the California Private Attorneys General Act, ORDER Plaintiff, 14 v. 15 USF REDDAWAY INC., an unknown business entity; YRC WORLDWIDE, INC., an unknown business entity; YELLOW CORPORATION, an unknown business entity; and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, Defendants. 20 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Carlos Rodriguez’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion to Remand. (ECF No. 9.) Defendants USF Reddaway, Inc. (“Reddaway”) and Yellow Corporation (formerly known as YRC Worldwide, Inc.) (collectively, “Defendants”) filed an opposition. (ECF No. 10.) Plaintiff filed a reply. (ECF No. 12.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand. /// /// /// I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND This action arises out of Defendants’ alleged wage and hour violations. (See ECF Nos. 1, 1-1.) From…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.